Photographic competitions

Here is a big comment, but I believe that all photographers calling themselves professional should be entering at least one professional photographic competition a year. If you are a member of that AIPP then it is a requirement of maintaining your membership to enter into the APPA's. Why do I say this? We have learnt so much from the competitions that we have entered and we have had a bit of success. We have also had a few disappointments along the way as well so it does balance out. I will admit we have been professional photographers for 8 years, but only started entering the competitions last year. That was definitely a mistake and in the end, slowed our progress. What better way is there than to get people with huge amounts of experience and technical skills to assess your work.

There are however, a couple of problems with the APPA's. Firstly it is very expensive to enter into the competition and secondly, and my point with this blog, is that you actually need to get the feedback from the judges to really benefit from the competition. That means you not only have the cost of entry, cost of the print and matting and the cost of posting to where ever the location is that year, you also have to travel to the judging. Costly from Townsville and there is also the time factor as well.

This is one of the reasons that I love the International Loupe Awards, (Google if interested). Entry is only $35/image, unlimited entry's and when you get the result you also get the judges feedback from between one and three of the judges. So here is my point. This is one of the images that has just come back from the International Loupe Awards.

The set up is the location shoot of a wedding at The Brewery, one of my favourite locations. We were photographing using the window light, generally in the narrow range, when I noticed the beautiful rim lighting effect that the light was having on Regina. The light is actually coming from the right and reflecting of the wall and through the window, stunning.

So what are your thought about it without cheating and checking on what the judges said about the image. (I have posted their comments below). I knew that I had problems with the reflections and when I took the image should have bracketed the image probably 2 to 3 stops under the exposure that I used. That would give me details in the highlighted areas that were blown out  in the original exposure.

Unfortunately, my Photoshop skills need work and that is one area I did get pick up on. The rest of the comments I completely missed. That being said the image scored 77, enough to score a bronze medal last year, but 3 points shy of award status this year. Still happy with the result and will think a little more about it next time. I also love this image but take on board what the judges have said.

Judges Comments:

Critique Comments:

Judge 1:   line runs directly through her nose

Judge 2:  The light on this is very nice and well handled. There a re a couple of fundamentals here though which weaken the image. Placement of the bride - just an inch back and you would not have that line going through her nose - its very distracting, you have taken the time to set this up so just note small things like this and adjust. She also looks a little stiff but her expression is relaxed. There is a lot of visible retouching which lets this down. Sometimes its good to just leave an image alone..

Judge 3: The line of the window, cut the nose of the Bride.

Beginner photography and Photoshop Courses

Hi all

Leiden Studios is excited to announce the dates of the first basic photography and Photoshop courses to be conducted from our studios in Annandale.

Basic SLR Operations & Image Capture

Saturday 24th November and 2st December 9.00am- 12.00am

1. Understanding the controls on an SLR
2. Basic Camera Settings
3. Basic Exposure

Participants must have an SLR camera.

Cost of Course:  $185.00

Basic Photoshop

Saturday 24th November and 2th December 1.00pm - 4.00pm

1. Setting up Photoshop
2. Basic Work flow
3. Working with adjustment layers
4. Blend Modes.

Participants will need a copy of Photoshop and a laptop. Leiden Studios will have a some spare computers but will be limited in their availability.

Cost of Course:  $185.00

Enrol in Both:  $300.00

Seats are limited so book quickly.

Malcolm is currently completing a Cert IV in Training and Assessment. He has been a photographer for over 20 years, firstly as chief medical photographer at Queensland Medical Laboratories in Brisbane. He and Kellie started Leiden Studios in 2005 and have built the business to what it is now. We are and award winning wedding, portrait and sports photography business.

The idea of the course is to teach people how to see light, and then take an image capture that can be printed into a fine art work. Leiden Studios has a printer capable of printing onto fine art paper, so let us see what North Queensland is capable of. We hope to have a gallery of student work on display after the first course.

Interested students should call the Leiden Studios office during office hours or email to register your interest. Places are filling fast, each course is limited to 8 people. The first 3 people who book will receive two 8x10 fine art prints of their work.

To book you must call or send an email to confirm your booking, we also require a 50% deposit to finalise your position.

Phone: 0407 977 530
email: enquiries@leidenstudios.com

Low Light Photograph

Welcome to Leiden Studios first educational post.

This image was actually posted on Facebook late last year with some of the details that go with the image, but I thought it was a great way to start a discussion about how Leiden Studios goes about it's image creation.

Nicole was one of our beautiful brides from last year. The image was taken on the second floor of Cactus Saloon in Flinders Street Townsville and our thanks goes to Cactus Saloon for the use of their premises. A lot of what we do could not be done without the co-operation of the clubs and pubs around Townsville.

The basic set up has a door to the left of Nicole that goes out onto a deck and provides a natural light source coming across her from left to right. She is place next to the door with her head turned towards the light source. Having her face the other way would put her face into shadow and would need to be corrected by either filling with flash or video light or similar, or a reflector. The last option would still be difficult to get enough light into her face.

Most of our photography is done in "manual" mode with the highlight alert set to on. Weddings are all about the dress and nothing spoils a shoot more that over exposing the dress and losing detail, especially if a lot of money has been spent on the dress. We also shoot all our images in "raw" rather than jpgs as this retains all the details of the image and allows us to make decisions on the image later in post production.

So for this shot the details were ISO 3200, f2.8 @ 1/125 second. This allows you to keep the depth of field narrow and focused on Nicole. You could play with the numbers and allow more detail in the barrels to come out, but you need to keep a close eye on the shutter speed to ensure a sharp image. The ISO could go to 6400 remembering that noise will increase at this number. However I would rather a sharp image with noise than a soft image without.

So the options would be to decrease the shutter speed, maybe with an increase in aperture, this will lighten the barrels and give a bit more detail in the raw image. However our look is probably a bit more dark and moody and by shooting in raw format we can bring back detail in the shadows in post production.

It would also be difficult to photograph this image on any auto mode. The camera would read the image as dark and try to lighten it. Taking a spot reading from the dress would under expose the image. I'll post and article at a later date about why the cameras does that, but it is out of the scope of this article.

So our raw image looked like this straight out of the camera. Not a lot needed post production which is exactly what we are trying to achieve on our shoots. One of the worst things with Photoshop is the notion that "I can fix that in Photoshop". More time is wasted trying to fix technical problems with the original capture than anything else in photography. Those new to the industry commonly make that mistake, I know I did. You only make it once though, no mater what your Photoshop skills, a poorly captured image will never look as good as a well captured image, ever. Get it right in camera the first time. Take a little time with the capture, and have a look at the image on the back of the camera. In doubt, check the histogram. Still in doubt, then do a bracket exposure around your current exposure.

Looking at the raw image, all it needed was a little straightening, the door is distracting so it is removed, the image is converted to Black & White using Nik software and a slight HDR effect is added also in Nik to increase the detail in the barrels and the dress. The right side of the face was lightened a little using Shadows/highlights in Image>Adjustments and to add a little more detail into the barrels.

The image has pride of place in Phil & Nicole's wedding album. Thanks to the couple, their wedding was a wonderful event, one we will not forget and we look forward to working with them in the future.

Any comment are welcome.